Wednesday, October 23, 2019

The Magic Lantern and Projected Photographs

In some ways, it's the original optical medium, the lanterna magica, the method behind the madness of Robertson's Phantasmagoria, the first device ever to "throw" an image on a screen. The great-granddaddy of the slide projector and the PowerPoint presentation, the technology that made the 'carousel' of life go 'round for Kodak, a mass medium and later a home entertainment system.

And, as Don Draper observed, it's about coming back to where we began, and feeling that strange 'twinge' of nostalgia -- which is why, I think, the Magic Lantern is presently enjoying a new life, a new vogue, and a new kind of magic. It began with folks such as Terry and Deborah Borton, who quit their day jobs to form the American Magic Lantern Theatre, and to write the first comprehensive account of the work of Joseph Boggs Beale, the premiere American lantern slide artist. It began with Joe and Alice Koch back in Tacoma, Washington in the 1960's; it began with Bill Douglas, Bob BishopOldřich Albrecht, Judith Thurman and Jonathan David, Julius Pfranger, John Barnes, and Steve Humphries -- all of whom rediscovered this lost medium and helped retrace its history even as they brought it back to life. For, as it turned out, audiences today were as readily enthralled -- though perhaps for different reasons -- as were their grandparent and great-grandparents in the heyday of the Magic Lantern. Old lanterns could be found and collected, as could old slides; put the two together, add a top-hat and a booming voice, and all the ingredients were there for a revival of this lost art.

In 1851, a crucial innovation in photography -- that of the wet-plate collodion process -- enabled the production of photographic lantern slides. The glass plates produced by this process were negative images, from which any number of glass positives or paper prints might be made; a more common method, for portraits and single-use images, was simply to place black paper or cloth behind the negative. A downside of the process was that the plates had to be exposed while still wet -- a very narrow window -- but this was later solved (1871) and various dry plate processes were developed.

For a good introduction, I've scanned the first section of the hard-to-find book Projected Photography, which is available to you in .pdf for via this link. As discussed in class, I'm also asking everyone to bring in a photo from you own personal or family archive -- it doesn't have to be an antique, simply a photo that has particular significance that you'd like to share.

4 comments:

  1. After reading the first few pages of Projected Photography, it never ceases to amaze me how much work went into photography that I and probably most people take for granted. Looking at the little boxes of projection plates just reminds me of how many processes and materials and tools were necessary to achieve what we can do with the tap of a finger. People no longer need to have any understanding of photography to take beautiful pictures. Our phones and their software takes care of that for us. I think it's good to go through the history of photography to gain some respect for what it means to take a picture.

    ReplyDelete
  2. A agree with Matt here. I think that we absolutely take photography for granted. The fact that we can literally take a photo in a second, and then in addition be able to share it through the internet, is wild.

    I recently purchased the Iphone 11, that comes with two cameras instead of one. I've noticed that with recent updates to phones, they keep adding more camera options with more pixels, etc. One of the big selling points for a lot of these new phones is their camera options.

    As far as technology goes, the Magic Lantern really reminds me of a common projector, but with a lot of extra work attached. I simply cannot imagine teaching without something like a projector!

    ReplyDelete
  3. On page 30, the author discusses Antonin Personnaz and his idea that the person working a projector, who he dubbed the "lanternist", is working with the photo as the "collaborator of the photograph". The collaboration involved includes the control of light in the display of the photograph, making the lanternist sort of the first photo-editor. I found this fascinating due to the fact that light manipulation is still a major part of modern day professional photo editing (and even a part of non-professional in the form of social media). It is fascinating to me how photo editing has essentially been around for over a century, and that now we are all "lanternists" of our own photos, so to speak.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I have to agree with Matt, too, we really do take photography for granted especially since we live in a generation where everyone is taking photos. Photography has come such a long way, we can click one button and have the image in front of us in seconds. A lot of work went into a lot of these Victorian inventions and it's really convenient that as time passed, the process got easier. I'd like to see a side by side use of the Magic Lantern and the modern day projector to get an idea as to how complicated the machinery was back then.

    ReplyDelete